No idea how Mistborn can be adapted into one movie. That’s a lot to fit into a couple of hours, even it just depicts the first book. I expected a TV series with 8-10 episodes per book! Maybe two movies per book? Eventually you’re going to run into The Hobbit problems.
{
"type": "entry",
"published": "2026-03-31T07:37:51.325823+00:00",
"url": "https://cleverdevil.io/2026/no-idea-how-mistborn-can-be-adapted-into",
"syndication": [
"https://cleverdevil.club/@jonathan/116322642924074459",
"https://bsky.app/profile/cleverdevil.io/post/3mido7rkh2s26"
],
"content": {
"text": "No idea how Mistborn can be adapted into one movie. That\u2019s a lot to fit into a couple of hours, even it just depicts the first book. I expected a TV series with 8-10 episodes per book! Maybe two movies per book? Eventually you\u2019re going to run into The Hobbit problems.",
"html": "<p>No idea how Mistborn can be adapted into one movie. That\u2019s a lot to fit into a couple of hours, even it just depicts the <em>first</em> book. I expected a TV series with 8-10 episodes per book! Maybe two movies per book? Eventually you\u2019re going to run into The Hobbit problems.</p>"
},
"author": {
"type": "card",
"name": "Jonathan LaCour",
"url": "https://cleverdevil.io",
"photo": "https://cleverdevil.io/profile/photo"
},
"post-type": "note",
"_id": "47805245",
"_source": "10"
}
TIL about UIScreenshotService which enables iOS apps to provide a high res PDF screenshot of the app content when the user uses the system screenshot action! Chrome uses this to give a full export of the page!
{
"type": "entry",
"published": "2026-03-30T09:55:49-06:00",
"url": "https://aaronparecki.com/2026/03/30/14/",
"category": [
"ios"
],
"syndication": [
"https://bsky.app/profile/aaronpk.com/post/3mibzlf54xu2i"
],
"content": {
"text": "TIL about UIScreenshotService which enables iOS apps to provide a high res PDF screenshot of the app content when the user uses the system screenshot action! Chrome uses this to give a full export of the page!"
},
"author": {
"type": "card",
"name": "Aaron Parecki",
"url": "https://aaronparecki.com/",
"photo": "https://aperture-media.p3k.io/aaronparecki.com/41061f9de825966faa22e9c42830e1d4a614a321213b4575b9488aa93f89817a.jpg"
},
"post-type": "note",
"_id": "47798061",
"_source": "16"
}
On select pages, I now check for a specific cookie. If it is not found or is more than 24 hours old, then the browser redirects to the “Sentience Check” page. That page is a minimal form with a button to indicate “Yes, I am a hooman.” Submitting the form sets the expected cookie and redirects back to the original page. If Javascript is enabled, it will submit the form as soon as the page loads, so most hooman visitors will only see the intermediate page for a second and should be able to continue without issues.
Also at fluffy’s suggestion, the sentience check page returns a response code of 429: Too Many Requests with a header that indicates: retry after one hour. I have no high expectation of the bots respecting that, but maybe the lack of successful response codes will cause some to back off.
The last thing I did was add a noindex meta tag on the page, so search engines should ignore it.
If you’d like to view the page, I recommend turning Javascript off temporarily and then visiting: gregorlove.com/sentience-check/.
I am interested to see how much this will reduce bot attempts on the contact and public sign-in pages. I have had CSRF and honeypot form field protections on both for quite a while, but of course I still see a lot of attempts on them.
Depending how this goes, I might expand its usage to the “send a webmention” form and explore using it to block LLM bots.
I did consider using “I am a meat popsicle” on the button, but not everyone might get The Fifth Element reference.
{
"type": "entry",
"published": "2026-03-29 18:49-0700",
"summary": "I am trying out a method to reduce bot attempts on forms like on my contact page based on fluffy\u2019s example.",
"url": "https://gregorlove.com/2026/03/i-am-testing-out/",
"category": [
"site-updates"
],
"content": {
"text": "I am trying out a method to reduce bot attempts on forms like on my contact page based on fluffy\u2019s example.\n\nOn select pages, I now check for a specific cookie. If it is not found or is more than 24 hours old, then the browser redirects to the \u201cSentience Check\u201d page. That page is a minimal form with a button to indicate \u201cYes, I am a hooman.\u201d Submitting the form sets the expected cookie and redirects back to the original page. If Javascript is enabled, it will submit the form as soon as the page loads, so most hooman visitors will only see the intermediate page for a second and should be able to continue without issues.\n\nAlso at fluffy\u2019s suggestion, the sentience check page returns a response code of 429: Too Many Requests with a header that indicates: retry after one hour. I have no high expectation of the bots respecting that, but maybe the lack of successful response codes will cause some to back off.\n\nThe last thing I did was add a noindex meta tag on the page, so search engines should ignore it.\n\nIf you\u2019d like to view the page, I recommend turning Javascript off temporarily and then visiting: gregorlove.com/sentience-check/.\n\nI am interested to see how much this will reduce bot attempts on the contact and public sign-in pages. I have had CSRF and honeypot form field protections on both for quite a while, but of course I still see a lot of attempts on them.\n\nDepending how this goes, I might expand its usage to the \u201csend a webmention\u201d form and explore using it to block LLM bots.\n\nI did consider using \u201cI am a meat popsicle\u201d on the button, but not everyone might get The Fifth Element reference.",
"html": "<p class=\"p-summary\">I am trying out a method to reduce bot attempts on forms like on my <a href=\"https://gregorlove.com/contact\">contact page</a> based on <a href=\"https://publ.beesbuzz.biz/manual/recipes/210-Crawler-mitigations\">fluffy\u2019s example</a>.</p>\n\n<p>On select pages, I now check for a specific cookie. If it is not found or is more than 24 hours old, then the browser redirects to the \u201cSentience Check\u201d page. That page is a minimal form with a button to indicate \u201cYes, I am a hooman.\u201d Submitting the form sets the expected cookie and redirects back to the original page. If Javascript is enabled, it will submit the form as soon as the page loads, so most hooman visitors will only see the intermediate page for a second and should be able to continue without issues.</p>\n\n<p>Also at fluffy\u2019s suggestion, the sentience check page returns a response code of <a href=\"https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Reference/Status/429\">429: Too Many Requests</a> with a header that indicates: retry after one hour. I have no high expectation of the bots respecting that, but maybe the lack of successful response codes will cause some to back off.</p>\n\n<p>The last thing I did was add a <code><a href=\"https://indieweb.org/Noindex\">noindex</a></code> meta tag on the page, so search engines should ignore it.</p>\n\n<p>If you\u2019d like to view the page, I recommend turning Javascript off temporarily and then visiting: <a href=\"https://gregorlove.com/sentience-check/\">gregorlove.com/sentience-check/</a>.</p>\n\n<p>I am interested to see how much this will reduce bot attempts on the contact and <a href=\"https://gregorlove.com/profile/\">public sign-in</a> pages. I have had <abbr title=\"Cross-Site Request Forgery\">CSRF</abbr> and honeypot form field protections on both for quite a while, but of course I still see a lot of attempts on them.</p>\n\n<p>Depending how this goes, I might expand its usage to the \u201csend a webmention\u201d form and explore using it to block LLM bots.</p>\n\n<p>I did consider using \u201cI am a meat popsicle\u201d on the button, but not everyone might get <a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WNBRgiChYeQ\">The Fifth Element reference</a>.</p>"
},
"author": {
"type": "card",
"name": "gRegor Morrill",
"url": "https://gregorlove.com/",
"photo": "https://gregorlove.com/site/assets/files/6268/profile-2021-square.300x0.jpg"
},
"post-type": "note",
"_id": "47793233",
"_source": "95"
}
{
"type": "event",
"name": "\ud83d\uddd3\ufe0f The Level Up",
"published": "2026-03-28T22:30:00-0500",
"start": "2026-03-28T22:30:00-0500",
"url": "https://martymcgui.re/2026/03/28/the-level-up/",
"featured": "https://res.cloudinary.com/schmarty/image/fetch/w_960,c_fill/https://media.martymcgui.re/ba/63/54/ca/af19d299710b372e70bb0860f7430a1294ce50d0d9f4c84c0fd207c1.png",
"category": [
"improv",
"show"
],
"location": {
"type": "card",
"name": "Magnet Theater",
"url": "https://magnettheater.com/"
},
"content": {
"text": "The Level Up is an indie improv showcase. Join us as we watch amazing New York indie improv talents gain XP on the Magnet stage, unlock new achievements, and reach new milestones. Or do comedy.\n\nCome support Michael as he dons his hosting-duties cap for three exciting indie teams!\nExtra Virgin - Instagram @ExtraVirginImprov\nStress Dream - Instagram @stressdreamcomedy\nScattergood - Instagram @scattergood_comedy\nI\u2019ll be playing with Michael and the rest of the Level Up!\nLooking forward to it! And to seeing you there!! (Yes, you. Come on out!!!)\nSaturday March 28th, 2026 @ 10:30pm\n\nMagnet Theater\n\n254 West 29th St (btwn 7th and 8th Ave.)\n\nNew York City, NY 10001\n\nTickets $10: https://magnettheater.com/show/tickets/60469/",
"html": "<blockquote>\n<p>The Level Up is an indie improv showcase. Join us as we watch amazing New York indie improv talents gain XP on the Magnet stage, unlock new achievements, and reach new milestones. Or do comedy.</p>\n</blockquote>\n<p>Come support Michael as he dons his hosting-duties cap for three exciting indie teams!</p>\n<ul><li>Extra Virgin - Instagram @ExtraVirginImprov</li>\n<li>Stress Dream - Instagram @stressdreamcomedy</li>\n<li>Scattergood - Instagram @scattergood_comedy</li>\n</ul><p>I\u2019ll be playing with Michael and the rest of the Level Up!</p>\n<p>Looking forward to it! And to seeing you there!! (Yes, you. Come on out!!!)</p>\n<p>Saturday March 28th, 2026 @ 10:30pm<br />\nMagnet Theater<br />\n254 West 29th St (btwn 7th and 8th Ave.)<br />\nNew York City, NY 10001<br />\nTickets $10: <a href=\"https://magnettheater.com/show/tickets/60469/\">https://magnettheater.com/show/tickets/60469/</a></p>"
},
"author": {
"type": "card",
"name": "Marty McGuire",
"url": "https://martymcgui.re/",
"photo": "https://martymcgui.re/images/logo.jpg"
},
"post-type": "event",
"_id": "47789875",
"_source": "175"
}
Hosting a dinner tomorrow. Just put an 8 pound bone-in pork shoulder on the Big Green Egg with my trusty (old) Stoker BBQ controller. I shot the URL to the monitoring page over to my OpenClaw agent and they’re gonna keep an eye on it while I sleep. My first AI monitored BBQ!
{
"type": "entry",
"published": "2026-03-29T07:47:19.318322+00:00",
"url": "https://cleverdevil.io/2026/hosting-a-dinner-tomorrow-just-put-an-8",
"syndication": [
"https://cleverdevil.club/@jonathan/116311355517417082",
"https://bsky.app/profile/cleverdevil.io/post/3mi6nsu5snf2j"
],
"content": {
"text": "Hosting a dinner tomorrow. Just put an 8 pound bone-in pork shoulder on the Big Green Egg with my trusty (old) Stoker BBQ controller. I shot the URL to the monitoring page over to my OpenClaw agent and they\u2019re gonna keep an eye on it while I sleep. My first AI monitored BBQ!",
"html": "<p>Hosting a dinner tomorrow. Just put an 8 pound bone-in pork shoulder on the Big Green Egg with my trusty (old) Stoker BBQ controller. I shot the URL to the monitoring page over to my OpenClaw agent and they\u2019re gonna keep an eye on it while I sleep. My first AI monitored BBQ!</p>"
},
"author": {
"type": "card",
"name": "Jonathan LaCour",
"url": "https://cleverdevil.io",
"photo": "https://cleverdevil.io/profile/photo"
},
"post-type": "note",
"_id": "47785846",
"_source": "10"
}
That was such a fun race! So happy for Kimi, and my boy Charles had the most impressive drive. George has an objectively faster car, and still got his ass beat for 20 laps. #F1v
{
"type": "entry",
"published": "2026-03-29T06:45:22.499283+00:00",
"url": "https://cleverdevil.io/2026/that-was-such-a-fun-race-so-happy-for-ki",
"syndication": [
"https://cleverdevil.club/@jonathan/116311111930240976",
"https://bsky.app/profile/cleverdevil.io/post/3mi6ke3irci2w"
],
"content": {
"text": "That was such a fun race! So happy for Kimi, and my boy Charles had the most impressive drive. George has an objectively faster car, and still got his ass beat for 20 laps. #F1v",
"html": "<p>That was such a fun race! So happy for Kimi, and my boy Charles had the most impressive drive. George has an objectively faster car, and still got his ass beat for 20 laps. #F1v</p>"
},
"author": {
"type": "card",
"name": "Jonathan LaCour",
"url": "https://cleverdevil.io",
"photo": "https://cleverdevil.io/profile/photo"
},
"post-type": "note",
"_id": "47785502",
"_source": "10"
}
{
"type": "entry",
"published": "2026-03-29T05:58:46.956061+00:00",
"url": "https://cleverdevil.io/2026/this-is-one-of-the-better-examples-of-ho",
"syndication": [
"https://cleverdevil.club/@jonathan/116310928722410832",
"https://bsky.app/profile/cleverdevil.io/post/3mi6hqrik3b2w"
],
"content": {
"text": "This is one of the better examples of how much luck influences an #F1 race. And it\u2019s not over yet. I have a feeling there may be another safety car\u2026",
"html": "<p>This is one of the better examples of how much luck influences an #F1 race. And it\u2019s not over yet. I have a feeling there may be another safety car\u2026</p>"
},
"author": {
"type": "card",
"name": "Jonathan LaCour",
"url": "https://cleverdevil.io",
"photo": "https://cleverdevil.io/profile/photo"
},
"post-type": "note",
"_id": "47785277",
"_source": "10"
}
Okay, I’m no longer appending permalinks to my syndicated microblog posts. Been meaning to get around to it, and today is the day thanks to OpenClaw 🦞🤖
{
"type": "entry",
"published": "2026-03-29T04:08:06.803432+00:00",
"url": "https://cleverdevil.io/2026/okay-im-no-longer-appending-permalinks-t",
"syndication": [
"https://cleverdevil.club/@jonathan/116310493554767126",
"https://bsky.app/profile/cleverdevil.io/post/3mi6bkuxhkb26"
],
"content": {
"text": "Okay, I\u2019m no longer appending permalinks to my syndicated microblog posts. Been meaning to get around to it, and today is the day thanks to OpenClaw \ud83e\udd9e\ud83e\udd16",
"html": "<p>Okay, I\u2019m no longer appending permalinks to my syndicated microblog posts. Been meaning to get around to it, and today is the day thanks to OpenClaw \ud83e\udd9e\ud83e\udd16</p>"
},
"author": {
"type": "card",
"name": "Jonathan LaCour",
"url": "https://cleverdevil.io",
"photo": "https://cleverdevil.io/profile/photo"
},
"post-type": "note",
"_id": "47784938",
"_source": "10"
}
{
"type": "entry",
"published": "2026-03-27T17:00:00-07:00",
"url": "https://nadreck.me/2026/03/writing-formats/",
"category": [
"writing",
"technical-writing"
],
"name": "Writing Formats",
"content": {
"text": "Last week I talked about technical writing as a role, and I figured I\u2019d run with that theme for a minute. One of the things I mentioned was that we tend to write in other formats, and I wanted to expand on that \u2013 if you\u2019re used to a \u201cWhat You See is What You Get\u201d (WYSIWYG) system like Microsoft Word or a Rich Text Format (RTF), or online editors, you might not think about writing formats much \u2013 if you want something bold, you click the bold button. The format is how that bold is represented under the hood. (This is related to, but slightly different from a file type \u2013 you can have multiple file types that actually use the same format behind the scenes, but are saved as a different type of file for various reasons.)\n\n\n\n Click for an infodump",
"html": "<p>Last week I talked about technical writing as a role, and I figured I\u2019d run with that theme for a minute. One of the things I mentioned was that we tend to write in other formats, and I wanted to expand on that \u2013 if you\u2019re used to a \u201cWhat You See is What You Get\u201d (WYSIWYG) system like Microsoft Word or a Rich Text Format (RTF), or online editors, you might not think about writing formats much \u2013 if you want something bold, you click the bold button. The format is how that bold is represented under the hood. (This is related to, but slightly different from a file type \u2013 you can have multiple file types that actually use the same format behind the scenes, but are saved as a different type of file for various reasons.)</p>\n\n\n\n <a href=\"https://nadreck.me/2026/03/writing-formats/#more-12197\">Click for an infodump</a>"
},
"author": {
"type": "card",
"name": "Nadreck",
"url": "http://nadreck.me",
"photo": null
},
"post-type": "article",
"_id": "47774501",
"_source": "2935"
}
In reflecting on my own typewriter collection, I thought I'd look through it to see how some of the models I gravitate toward compare to those others are collecting. As a potential proxy for this, I took a look at the most popularly collected typewriter models according to the Typewriter Database and compiled a list of the top fifty, which appears below. (Numbers in parenthesis are the number of examples in the database.)
Naturally the data isn't perfect and some of the numbers broadly track the manufacturing numbers of some of the most widely made models across the 20th century, particularly models which, though they changed in style and design over time, kept the same model name for decades. Despite this, the list of the top 50 doesn't seem too far off of what one might expect.
Which models would you have expected to see more of? Which less? Does your taste in machines track the most "popular" by this measure? How does this list compared to the Rarity vs. Desirability list from ETC Magazine with respect to your collection? What other measures or benchmarks might one consider in collecting?
Have you uploaded all of your own examples to the Typewriter Database to help "even out" the data? Even if you don't add them all, which favorites will you add to help your "favorite team" move up the rankings?
1. Royal Quiet De Luxe (610)
2. Smith-Corona Sterling (400)
3. Olympia SM3 (381)
4. Hermes 3000 (363)
5. Olympia SM9 (340)
6. Underwood 5 (304)
7. Olivetti Lettera 32 (262)
8. Corona 3 (252)
9. Smith-Corona Silent (246)
10. Remington Portable (244)
11. Olivetti Lettera 22 (241)
12. Royal P (240)
13. Hermes Baby (227)
14. Royal 10 (225)
15. Smith-Corona Skyriter (213)
16. Smith-Corona Silent Super (211)
17. Underwood Universal (175)
18. Royal KMM (163)
19. Remington Quiet-Riter (150)
20. Corona 4 (143)
21. Smith-Corona Standard (140)
22. Olivetti Studio 44 (139)
23. Olympia SM4 (137)
24. Underwood Portable 4 bank (136)
25. Royal O (136)
26. Hermes Rocket (134)
27. Olympia SM7 (129)
28. Underwood Portable 3 bank (118)
29. Smith-Corona Clipper (116)
30. Smith-Corona Classic 12 (115)
31. Royal Futura 800 (114)
32. Olympia SG1 (113)
33. Hermes 2000 (112)
34. Groma Kolibri (112)
35. Royal HH (106)
36. Royal Arrow (105)
37. Underwood Champion (103)
38. Remington Deluxe Model 5 (99)
39. Continental Standard (94)
40. Remington Noiseless 7 (93)
41. Olympia SM2 (92)
42. Olympia SG3 (91)
43. Oliver 9 (87)
44. Underwood 6 (86)
45. Royal KMG (86)
46. Remington Portable 5 (85)
47. Royal Aristocrat (84)
48. Olympia SF (83)
49. Smith-Corona Galaxie Twelve (81)
50. Remington Portable 3 (80)
{
"type": "entry",
"published": "2026-03-26T22:41:24-07:00",
"summary": "In reflecting on my own typewriter collection, I thought I’d look through it to see how some of the models I gravitate toward compare to those others are collecting. As a potential proxy for this, I took a look at the most popularly collected typewriter models according to the Typewriter Database and compiled a list … <a href=\"https://boffosocko.com/2026/03/26/most-collected-typewriters-on-the-typewriter-database/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Most Collected Typewriters on the Typewriter Database</span></a>",
"url": "https://boffosocko.com/2026/03/26/most-collected-typewriters-on-the-typewriter-database/",
"featured": "https://boffosocko.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/wp-1715623153974668920892920990135.jpg",
"category": [
"Typewriters",
"ETC Magazine",
"typewriter collecting",
"Typewriter Database"
],
"content": {
"text": "In reflecting on my own typewriter collection, I thought I'd look through it to see how some of the models I gravitate toward compare to those others are collecting. As a potential proxy for this, I took a look at the most popularly collected typewriter models according to the Typewriter Database and compiled a list of the top fifty, which appears below. (Numbers in parenthesis are the number of examples in the database.)\u00a0\n\nNaturally the data isn't perfect and some of the numbers broadly track the manufacturing numbers of some of the most widely made models across the 20th century, particularly models which, though they changed in style and design over time, kept the same model name for decades. Despite this, the list of the top 50 doesn't seem too far off of what one might expect.\u00a0\n\nWhich models would you have expected to see more of? Which less? Does your taste in machines track the most \"popular\" by this measure? How does this list compared to the Rarity vs. Desirability list from ETC Magazine with respect to your collection? What other measures or benchmarks might one consider in collecting?\n\nHave you uploaded all of your own examples to the Typewriter Database to help \"even out\" the data? Even if you don't add them all, which favorites will you add to help your \"favorite team\" move up the rankings?\n\n1. Royal Quiet De Luxe (610)\n\n2. Smith-Corona Sterling (400)\n\n3. Olympia SM3 (381)\n\n4. Hermes 3000 (363)\n\n5. Olympia SM9 (340)\n\n6. Underwood 5 (304)\n\n7. Olivetti Lettera 32 (262)\n\n8. Corona 3 (252)\n\n9. Smith-Corona Silent (246)\n\n10. Remington Portable (244)\n\n11. Olivetti Lettera 22 (241)\n\n12. Royal P (240)\n\n13. Hermes Baby (227)\n\n14. Royal 10 (225)\n\n15. Smith-Corona Skyriter (213)\n\n16. Smith-Corona Silent Super (211)\n\n17. Underwood Universal (175)\n\n18. Royal KMM (163)\n\n19. Remington Quiet-Riter (150)\n\n20. Corona 4 (143)\n\n21. Smith-Corona Standard (140)\n\n22. Olivetti Studio 44 (139)\n\n23. Olympia SM4 (137)\n\n24. Underwood Portable 4 bank (136)\n\n25. Royal O (136)\n\n26. Hermes Rocket (134)\n\n27. Olympia SM7 (129)\n\n28. Underwood Portable 3 bank (118)\n\n29. Smith-Corona Clipper (116)\n\n30. Smith-Corona Classic 12 (115)\n\n31. Royal Futura 800 (114)\n\n32. Olympia SG1 (113)\n\n33. Hermes 2000 (112)\n\n34. Groma Kolibri (112)\n\n35. Royal HH (106)\n\n36. Royal Arrow (105)\n\n37. Underwood Champion (103)\n\n38. Remington Deluxe Model 5 (99)\n\n39. Continental Standard (94)\n\n40. Remington Noiseless 7 (93)\n\n41. Olympia SM2 (92)\n\n42. Olympia SG3 (91)\n\n43. Oliver 9 (87)\n\n44. Underwood 6 (86)\n\n45. Royal KMG (86)\n\n46. Remington Portable 5 (85)\n\n47. Royal Aristocrat (84)\n\n48. Olympia SF (83)\n\n49. Smith-Corona Galaxie Twelve (81)\n\n50. Remington Portable 3 (80)",
"html": "In reflecting on my own typewriter collection, I thought I'd look through it to see how some of the models I gravitate toward compare to those others are collecting. As a potential proxy for this, I took a look at the <a href=\"https://typewriterdatabase.com/popular.0.typewriter-models\">most popularly collected typewriter models according to the Typewriter Database</a> and compiled a list of the top fifty, which appears below. (Numbers in parenthesis are the number of examples in the database.)\u00a0\n\nNaturally the data isn't perfect and some of the numbers broadly track the manufacturing numbers of some of the most widely made models across the 20th century, particularly models which, though they changed in style and design over time, kept the same model name for decades. Despite this, the list of the top 50 doesn't seem too far off of what one might expect.\u00a0\n\nWhich models would you have expected to see more of? Which less? Does your taste in machines track the most \"popular\" by this measure? How does this list compared to the <a href=\"https://www.antikeychop.com/mostwantedtypewriters\">Rarity vs. Desirability list from ETC Magazine</a> with respect to your collection? What other measures or benchmarks might one consider in collecting?\n\nHave you uploaded all of your own examples to the Typewriter Database to help \"even out\" the data? Even if you don't add them all, which favorites will you add to help your \"favorite team\" move up the rankings?\n\n1. Royal Quiet De Luxe (610)<br />\n2. Smith-Corona Sterling (400)<br />\n3. Olympia SM3 (381)<br />\n4. Hermes 3000 (363)<br />\n5. Olympia SM9 (340)<br />\n6. Underwood 5 (304)<br />\n7. Olivetti Lettera 32 (262)<br />\n8. Corona 3 (252)<br />\n9. Smith-Corona Silent (246)<br />\n10. Remington Portable (244)<br />\n11. Olivetti Lettera 22 (241)<br />\n12. Royal P (240)<br />\n13. Hermes Baby (227)<br />\n14. Royal 10 (225)<br />\n15. Smith-Corona Skyriter (213)<br />\n16. Smith-Corona Silent Super (211)<br />\n17. Underwood Universal (175)<br />\n18. Royal KMM (163)<br />\n19. Remington Quiet-Riter (150)<br />\n20. Corona 4 (143)<br />\n21. Smith-Corona Standard (140)<br />\n22. Olivetti Studio 44 (139)<br />\n23. Olympia SM4 (137)<br />\n24. Underwood Portable 4 bank (136)<br />\n25. Royal O (136)<br />\n26. Hermes Rocket (134)<br />\n27. Olympia SM7 (129)<br />\n28. Underwood Portable 3 bank (118)<br />\n29. Smith-Corona Clipper (116)<br />\n30. Smith-Corona Classic 12 (115)<br />\n31. Royal Futura 800 (114)<br />\n32. Olympia SG1 (113)<br />\n33. Hermes 2000 (112)<br />\n34. Groma Kolibri (112)<br />\n35. Royal HH (106)<br />\n36. Royal Arrow (105)<br />\n37. Underwood Champion (103)<br />\n38. Remington Deluxe Model 5 (99)<br />\n39. Continental Standard (94)<br />\n40. Remington Noiseless 7 (93)<br />\n41. Olympia SM2 (92)<br />\n42. Olympia SG3 (91)<br />\n43. Oliver 9 (87)<br />\n44. Underwood 6 (86)<br />\n45. Royal KMG (86)<br />\n46. Remington Portable 5 (85)<br />\n47. Royal Aristocrat (84)<br />\n48. Olympia SF (83)<br />\n49. Smith-Corona Galaxie Twelve (81)<br />\n50. Remington Portable 3 (80)"
},
"author": {
"type": "card",
"name": null,
"url": null,
"photo": null
},
"post-type": "note",
"_id": "47765654",
"_source": "2785"
}
