{
"type": "entry",
"author": {
"name": "Cathie",
"url": "https://cathieleblanc.com/",
"photo": null
},
"url": "https://cathieleblanc.com/2021/09/21/cluster-learning-process-complexity/",
"published": "2021-09-21T21:34:44-04:00",
"content": {
"html": "<p>To prepare for the next meeting of the <a href=\"https://colab.plymouthcreate.net/cplc/\">Cluster Pedagogy Learning Community</a> (CPLC) at Plymouth State University, I (re)read three articles, each of which is focused on one aspect of our Integrated Cluster Learning Model. Although I have read all of these articles before, reading them back to back to back made me think of their commonalities in a way that I hadn\u2019t before. All three of the strands of the Integrated Cluster Learning Model emphasize process over product and resist attempts to simplify the complexities we encounter when we engage students in authentic learning.</p>\n<p>The first article is <a href=\"http://stager.org/articles/goodpbl.pdf\"><em>What Makes a Good Project?</em></a> by Gary Stager. He writes:</p>\n<blockquote><p>The Constructivist Consortium believes in Papert\u2019s theory of constructionism; the idea that the best way to construct knowledge, or understanding, is through the construction of something shareable, outside of a student\u2019s head. Those artifacts are commonly thought of as projects, even though the project development process is where the learning occurs.</p></blockquote>\n<p>On rereading this paragraph, I was really struck by \u201cthe project development process is where the learning occurs.\u201d In various conversations about what we are trying to do in <em>Tackling a Wicked Problem</em>, groups of faculty have talked about \u201cprojects\u201d being more about process rather than the actual product.</p>\n<p>The article goes on to explain the elements of a good project, one of which is complexity:</p>\n<blockquote><p>The best projects combine multiple subject areas and call upon the prior knowledge and expertise of each student. Best of all, serendipitous insights and connections to big ideas lead to the greatest payoff for learners.</p></blockquote>\n<p>Because the project draws upon \u201cthe prior knowledge and expertise of each student,\u201d these projects cannot be completely planned ahead of time which adds an additional level of complexity. Even if two groups of students are working on similar projects, they will be different because the students bring different prior knowledge and expertise to the table.</p>\n<p>Our PSU colleague, Abby Goode, wrote the next article we read for homework: <em><a href=\"https://hybridpedagogy.org/slow-interdisciplinarity/\">Slow Interdisciplinarity</a></em>. She critiques shallow, facile attempts to bring interdisciplinarity into students\u2019 education: \u201cIn our frenzy to be interdisciplinary, we are often quick to label our work and our courses as such, without putting pressure on the implicit knowledge divides and hierarchies that govern intellectual life, without recognizing the vital role that students play in rendering a learning experience interdisciplinary.\u201d She advocates that we focus on \u201cslowing down, making space for conversations about disciplinary divides and methods, and recognizing how those divides affect the classroom community.\u201d Goode concludes by saying:</p>\n<blockquote><p>Most importantly, interdisciplinarity comes from <em>the learners themselves</em> \u2014 their fields, their experiences, their ways of knowing. It comes from the questions that they choose to pursue and the collaborations that they undertake. It is a dynamic process, and one that is slower than we think.</p></blockquote>\n<p>Her focus in this piece is on the dynamic, explicit process of bringing students into the conversation about interdisciplinarity. Like Stager, Goode articulates the complexity of this process: \u201cit is incredibly challenging to articulate what we do in our disciplines and why. In fact, some students in the same major disagreed with one another about their field\u2019s priorities and methods.\u201d Rather than shying away from that complexity, she encourages us to ask:</p>\n<blockquote><p>To what extent do we encourage <em>disciplinary awareness</em> in our own fields and major courses? To what extent do we prepare students for the kinds of interdisciplinary work that they will encounter in their courses and careers? Do they know what they do in their discipline and why it is important? Can they explain it to someone outside of their field?</p></blockquote>\n<p>The final article that we read is <a href=\"https://press.rebus.community/openatthemargins/chapter/open-education-open-questions/\"><em>Open Education, Open Questions</em></a> by Catherine Cronin who begins with an exploration of what we mean by \u201copen\u201d when we talk about open educational practices (OEP). One of the goals of OEP, Cronin writes, is to \u201crespect and empower learners as co-producers on their lifelong, learning paths.\u201d As we engage in OEP, we embrace the fact that learning is a lifelong process and our role is to help students gain a sense of agency in that process.</p>\n<p>Cronin explains, however, that it may be tempting to paint \u201copen\u201d as \u201cgood\u201d in opposition to \u201cclosed\u201d as \u201cbad.\u201d Openness is more complex than this dichotomy implies. Openness carries risks as <a href=\"https://savasavasava.wordpress.com/2015/06/27/the-fallacy-of-open/\">sava singh has written</a>: \u201cThe people calling for open are often in positions of privilege, or have reaped the benefits of being open early on \u2014 when the platform wasn\u2019t as easily used for abuse, and when we were privileged to create the kinds of networks that included others like us.\u201d Cronin concludes:</p>\n<blockquote><p>In summary, openness does not involve a one-time decision, and it is not universally experienced. It is always complex, personal, contextual, and continually negotiated. Attention must be paid to the actual experiences and concerns of students and faculty. Critical approaches are essential.</p></blockquote>\n<p>Re-reading these three articles also gave me insight into why so many of us are rankled by Quallity Matters certification of online courses (see Burtis and Stommel, <a href=\"https://hybridpedagogy.org/the-cult-of-quality-matters/\"><em>The Cult of Quality Matters</em></a>, for an excellent articulation of the concerns). <a href=\"https://www.qualitymatters.org/qm-membership/faqs/course-review-preparation\">From the QM web site</a> (emphasis mine):</p>\n<blockquote><p>For purposes of protecting the confidentiality of student information, the institution should provide a shell or clone, rather than access to a live course. <strong><em>QM only reviews the design of the course</em></strong>, and reviewers should not be provided the ability to review student activity or information or to have any contact with students in any course submitted for review.</p></blockquote>\n<p>In other words, QM course certification requires that we remove students entirely in order for the review to proceed. The reviewers will look only at the design of the course, a seemingly stand-alone product. The certification is not at all concerned with the actual teaching of the course.</p>\n<p>The three articles that we read for our CPLC homework all focus on the particular students in the class and what they bring to the educational endeavor. According to Stager, project-based learning jumps off from each student\u2019s prior knowledge and expertise. According to Goode, interdisciplinarity comes from the students themselves, their fields, experiences, etc. And according to Cronin, responsible open educational practices require careful attention to the actual experiences and concerns of students. It is no wonder that some of us who are committed to the Integrated Cluster Learning Model disagreed with the foundational premises of QM certification.</p>\n\n<p>Image Credit: I took this photo on September 1, 2021</p>",
"text": "To prepare for the next meeting of the Cluster Pedagogy Learning Community (CPLC) at Plymouth State University, I (re)read three articles, each of which is focused on one aspect of our Integrated Cluster Learning Model. Although I have read all of these articles before, reading them back to back to back made me think of their commonalities in a way that I hadn\u2019t before. All three of the strands of the Integrated Cluster Learning Model emphasize process over product and resist attempts to simplify the complexities we encounter when we engage students in authentic learning.\nThe first article is What Makes a Good Project? by Gary Stager. He writes:\nThe Constructivist Consortium believes in Papert\u2019s theory of constructionism; the idea that the best way to construct knowledge, or understanding, is through the construction of something shareable, outside of a student\u2019s head. Those artifacts are commonly thought of as projects, even though the project development process is where the learning occurs.\nOn rereading this paragraph, I was really struck by \u201cthe project development process is where the learning occurs.\u201d In various conversations about what we are trying to do in Tackling a Wicked Problem, groups of faculty have talked about \u201cprojects\u201d being more about process rather than the actual product.\nThe article goes on to explain the elements of a good project, one of which is complexity:\nThe best projects combine multiple subject areas and call upon the prior knowledge and expertise of each student. Best of all, serendipitous insights and connections to big ideas lead to the greatest payoff for learners.\nBecause the project draws upon \u201cthe prior knowledge and expertise of each student,\u201d these projects cannot be completely planned ahead of time which adds an additional level of complexity. Even if two groups of students are working on similar projects, they will be different because the students bring different prior knowledge and expertise to the table.\nOur PSU colleague, Abby Goode, wrote the next article we read for homework: Slow Interdisciplinarity. She critiques shallow, facile attempts to bring interdisciplinarity into students\u2019 education: \u201cIn our frenzy to be interdisciplinary, we are often quick to label our work and our courses as such, without putting pressure on the implicit knowledge divides and hierarchies that govern intellectual life, without recognizing the vital role that students play in rendering a learning experience interdisciplinary.\u201d She advocates that we focus on \u201cslowing down, making space for conversations about disciplinary divides and methods, and recognizing how those divides affect the classroom community.\u201d Goode concludes by saying:\nMost importantly, interdisciplinarity comes from the learners themselves \u2014 their fields, their experiences, their ways of knowing. It comes from the questions that they choose to pursue and the collaborations that they undertake. It is a dynamic process, and one that is slower than we think.\nHer focus in this piece is on the dynamic, explicit process of bringing students into the conversation about interdisciplinarity. Like Stager, Goode articulates the complexity of this process: \u201cit is incredibly challenging to articulate what we do in our disciplines and why. In fact, some students in the same major disagreed with one another about their field\u2019s priorities and methods.\u201d Rather than shying away from that complexity, she encourages us to ask:\nTo what extent do we encourage disciplinary awareness in our own fields and major courses? To what extent do we prepare students for the kinds of interdisciplinary work that they will encounter in their courses and careers? Do they know what they do in their discipline and why it is important? Can they explain it to someone outside of their field?\nThe final article that we read is Open Education, Open Questions by Catherine Cronin who begins with an exploration of what we mean by \u201copen\u201d when we talk about open educational practices (OEP). One of the goals of OEP, Cronin writes, is to \u201crespect and empower learners as co-producers on their lifelong, learning paths.\u201d As we engage in OEP, we embrace the fact that learning is a lifelong process and our role is to help students gain a sense of agency in that process.\nCronin explains, however, that it may be tempting to paint \u201copen\u201d as \u201cgood\u201d in opposition to \u201cclosed\u201d as \u201cbad.\u201d Openness is more complex than this dichotomy implies. Openness carries risks as sava singh has written: \u201cThe people calling for open are often in positions of privilege, or have reaped the benefits of being open early on \u2014 when the platform wasn\u2019t as easily used for abuse, and when we were privileged to create the kinds of networks that included others like us.\u201d Cronin concludes:\nIn summary, openness does not involve a one-time decision, and it is not universally experienced. It is always complex, personal, contextual, and continually negotiated. Attention must be paid to the actual experiences and concerns of students and faculty. Critical approaches are essential.\nRe-reading these three articles also gave me insight into why so many of us are rankled by Quallity Matters certification of online courses (see Burtis and Stommel, The Cult of Quality Matters, for an excellent articulation of the concerns). From the QM web site (emphasis mine):\nFor purposes of protecting the confidentiality of student information, the institution should provide a shell or clone, rather than access to a live course. QM only reviews the design of the course, and reviewers should not be provided the ability to review student activity or information or to have any contact with students in any course submitted for review.\nIn other words, QM course certification requires that we remove students entirely in order for the review to proceed. The reviewers will look only at the design of the course, a seemingly stand-alone product. The certification is not at all concerned with the actual teaching of the course.\nThe three articles that we read for our CPLC homework all focus on the particular students in the class and what they bring to the educational endeavor. According to Stager, project-based learning jumps off from each student\u2019s prior knowledge and expertise. According to Goode, interdisciplinarity comes from the students themselves, their fields, experiences, etc. And according to Cronin, responsible open educational practices require careful attention to the actual experiences and concerns of students. It is no wonder that some of us who are committed to the Integrated Cluster Learning Model disagreed with the foundational premises of QM certification.\n\nImage Credit: I took this photo on September 1, 2021"
},
"name": "Cluster Learning: Focus on Process and Complexity",
"post-type": "article",
"_id": "23721178",
"_source": "2782"
}
{
"type": "entry",
"published": "2021-09-22T02:53:08+00:00",
"url": "https://twitter.com/Johannes_Ernst/status/1440509438561951744",
"content": {
"text": "If researchers were only going to find out you are doing a good job, why would you obfuscate their work, #Facebook? themarkup.org/citizen-browse\u2026",
"html": "If researchers were only going to find out you are doing a good job, why would you obfuscate their work, <a href=\"https://twitter.com/search?q=%23Facebook\">#Facebook</a>? <a href=\"https://themarkup.org/citizen-browser/2021/09/21/facebook-rolls-out-news-feed-change-that-blocks-watchdogs-from-gathering-data\">themarkup.org/citizen-browse\u2026</a>"
},
"author": {
"type": "card",
"name": "Johannes Ernst",
"url": "https://twitter.com/Johannes_Ernst",
"photo": "https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/462335209015238656/ie0cRjdx.jpeg"
},
"post-type": "note",
"_id": "23719809",
"_source": "2773"
}
People need to learn there is no "true" pizza because pizza itself is a product of fusion cuisine and from a wildly fractious country that is only a single country becaus...
{
"type": "entry",
"published": "2021-09-22T02:24:35+00:00",
"url": "https://twitter.com/karabaic/status/1440502253991854085",
"quotation-of": "https://twitter.com/TethysNoodler/status/1440358847563010061",
"content": {
"text": "You\u2019re talking about Greece, right?"
},
"author": {
"type": "card",
"name": "uncoordinated authentic behaviorist",
"url": "https://twitter.com/karabaic",
"photo": "https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1256785873384861696/QfRzUvne.jpg"
},
"post-type": "note",
"refs": {
"https://twitter.com/TethysNoodler/status/1440358847563010061": {
"type": "entry",
"published": "2021-09-21T16:54:44+00:00",
"url": "https://twitter.com/TethysNoodler/status/1440358847563010061",
"content": {
"text": "People need to learn there is no \"true\" pizza because pizza itself is a product of fusion cuisine and from a wildly fractious country that is only a single country because the rest of Europe hates it.\n\nYou can just do whatever with pizza.\n\nIt's fucking pizza.\ntwitter.com/GamerGirlRight\u2026",
"html": "People need to learn there is no \"true\" pizza because pizza itself is a product of fusion cuisine and from a wildly fractious country that is only a single country because the rest of Europe hates it.\n\nYou can just do whatever with pizza.\n\nIt's fucking pizza.\n<a href=\"https://twitter.com/GamerGirlRights/status/1440272100065878024\">twitter.com/GamerGirlRight\u2026</a>"
},
"author": {
"type": "card",
"name": "Eva Cantor, scofflaw in both senses of the word",
"url": "https://twitter.com/TethysNoodler",
"photo": "https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1397734610109349888/a5LWjFVJ.jpg"
},
"post-type": "note"
}
},
"_id": "23719374",
"_source": "2773"
}
Hey @ntnsndr, would you know of any systematic comparison between a traditional or multi-stakeholder coop model, and a crypto-based governance token model for the governance of multi-stakeholder, long-term projects? (Hope you don't mind me asking here.)
{
"type": "entry",
"published": "2021-09-22T00:40:39+00:00",
"url": "https://twitter.com/Johannes_Ernst/status/1440476099394240513",
"content": {
"text": "Hey @ntnsndr, would you know of any systematic comparison between a traditional or multi-stakeholder coop model, and a crypto-based governance token model for the governance of multi-stakeholder, long-term projects? (Hope you don't mind me asking here.)",
"html": "Hey <a href=\"https://twitter.com/ntnsndr\">@ntnsndr</a>, would you know of any systematic comparison between a traditional or multi-stakeholder coop model, and a crypto-based governance token model for the governance of multi-stakeholder, long-term projects? (Hope you don't mind me asking here.)"
},
"author": {
"type": "card",
"name": "Johannes Ernst",
"url": "https://twitter.com/Johannes_Ernst",
"photo": "https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/462335209015238656/ie0cRjdx.jpeg"
},
"post-type": "note",
"_id": "23717861",
"_source": "2773"
}
Watching @ijustine’s review of the iPhone 13 Pro and three things stand out to me:
1. Macro mode is mind-blowing!
2. Having Cinematic mode on the *selfie camera* is damn impressive, although no 4K is a bummer (also on non-Pro models).
3. The gold color option is gorgeous. 🤤
{
"type": "entry",
"published": "2021-09-21T21:37:42+00:00",
"url": "https://twitter.com/jaredcwhite/status/1440430058481483786",
"content": {
"text": "Watching @ijustine\u2019s review of the iPhone 13 Pro and three things stand out to me:\n\n1. Macro mode is mind-blowing!\n2. Having Cinematic mode on the *selfie camera* is damn impressive, although no 4K is a bummer (also on non-Pro models).\n3. The gold color option is gorgeous. \ud83e\udd24",
"html": "Watching <a href=\"https://twitter.com/ijustine\">@ijustine</a>\u2019s review of the iPhone 13 Pro and three things stand out to me:\n\n1. Macro mode is mind-blowing!\n2. Having Cinematic mode on the *selfie camera* is damn impressive, although no 4K is a bummer (also on non-Pro models).\n3. The gold color option is gorgeous. \ud83e\udd24"
},
"author": {
"type": "card",
"name": "Jared White \ud83d\udd2e",
"url": "https://twitter.com/jaredcwhite",
"photo": "https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1431863008288931841/hsLQJBv4.jpg"
},
"post-type": "note",
"_id": "23714378",
"_source": "2773"
}
Hearty congratulations to the Lit team! I look forward to spending more time diving into all the latest goodies. Off to watch the livestream replay now…
twitter.com/buildwithlit/s…
The Lit team is proud to announce the stable release of Lit 2.0!
We would like to thank the Lit & web communities for all the feedback and support which continue to make...
{
"type": "entry",
"published": "2021-09-21T19:22:05+00:00",
"url": "https://twitter.com/jaredcwhite/status/1440395931103367171",
"quotation-of": "https://twitter.com/buildWithLit/status/1440388855971008514",
"content": {
"text": "Hearty congratulations to the Lit team! I look forward to spending more time diving into all the latest goodies. Off to watch the livestream replay now\u2026\ntwitter.com/buildwithlit/s\u2026",
"html": "Hearty congratulations to the Lit team! I look forward to spending more time diving into all the latest goodies. Off to watch the livestream replay now\u2026\n<a href=\"https://twitter.com/buildwithlit/status/1440388855971008514\">twitter.com/buildwithlit/s\u2026</a>"
},
"author": {
"type": "card",
"name": "Jared White \ud83d\udd2e",
"url": "https://twitter.com/jaredcwhite",
"photo": "https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1431863008288931841/hsLQJBv4.jpg"
},
"post-type": "note",
"refs": {
"https://twitter.com/buildWithLit/status/1440388855971008514": {
"type": "entry",
"published": "2021-09-21T18:53:59+00:00",
"url": "https://twitter.com/buildWithLit/status/1440388855971008514",
"content": {
"text": "The Lit team is proud to announce the stable release of Lit 2.0!\n\nWe would like to thank the Lit & web communities for all the feedback and support which continue to make Lit a reality!\n\nLearn all about the Lit 2.0 release here:\n\nlit.dev/blog/2021-09-2\u2026",
"html": "The Lit team is proud to announce the stable release of Lit 2.0!\n\nWe would like to thank the Lit & web communities for all the feedback and support which continue to make Lit a reality!\n\nLearn all about the Lit 2.0 release here:\n\n<a href=\"https://lit.dev/blog/2021-09-21-announcing-lit-2/\">lit.dev/blog/2021-09-2\u2026</a>"
},
"author": {
"type": "card",
"name": "Lit",
"url": "https://twitter.com/buildWithLit",
"photo": "https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1384570088183894016/AxpzVqHJ.jpg"
},
"post-type": "note"
}
},
"_id": "23711170",
"_source": "2773"
}
I just got approved to take Wednesdays off the day job using PTO for the next two months. 🎉
I was trying to figure out how to fit everything in (studying for series 65, german class, skating, weekly radio show/livestream, shipping orders), and I'm so grateful for this solution.
{
"type": "entry",
"published": "2021-09-21T18:28:15+00:00",
"url": "https://twitter.com/anomalily/status/1440382381261688834",
"content": {
"text": "I just got approved to take Wednesdays off the day job using PTO for the next two months. \ud83c\udf89\n\nI was trying to figure out how to fit everything in (studying for series 65, german class, skating, weekly radio show/livestream, shipping orders), and I'm so grateful for this solution."
},
"author": {
"type": "card",
"name": "Lillian Karabaic",
"url": "https://twitter.com/anomalily",
"photo": "https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1123802400731664385/dsHQG1nZ.jpg"
},
"post-type": "note",
"_id": "23709771",
"_source": "2773"
}
!!! news. mother of all lawsuits quietly filed last month vs Facebook in Delaware. I'll explain why it avoided notice until now in a bit but Zuckerberg, Sandberg, CFO, b...
{
"type": "entry",
"published": "2021-09-21T17:21:55+00:00",
"url": "https://twitter.com/Johannes_Ernst/status/1440365687147417619",
"quotation-of": "https://twitter.com/jason_kint/status/1440304941428473857",
"content": {
"text": "Read this if you have any doubt about whether Facebook is an unethical company."
},
"author": {
"type": "card",
"name": "Johannes Ernst",
"url": "https://twitter.com/Johannes_Ernst",
"photo": "https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/462335209015238656/ie0cRjdx.jpeg"
},
"post-type": "note",
"refs": {
"https://twitter.com/jason_kint/status/1440304941428473857": {
"type": "entry",
"published": "2021-09-21T13:20:32+00:00",
"url": "https://twitter.com/jason_kint/status/1440304941428473857",
"photo": [
"https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E_z9dAlVIAA7hcH.png"
],
"content": {
"text": "!!! news. mother of all lawsuits quietly filed last month vs Facebook in Delaware. I'll explain why it avoided notice until now in a bit but Zuckerberg, Sandberg, CFO, board inc Peter Thiel and Palantir are defendants - it's a result of sealed docs between FB execs and board. /1"
},
"author": {
"type": "card",
"name": "Jason Kint",
"url": "https://twitter.com/jason_kint",
"photo": "https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1371678527360282627/kZFR40_7.jpg"
},
"post-type": "photo"
}
},
"_id": "23708212",
"_source": "2773"
}