Are you getting your reps in during eternal Caturday?
{
"type": "entry",
"published": "2022-07-31T00:05:54-0400",
"url": "https://martymcgui.re/2022/07/31/000554/",
"category": [
"caturday"
],
"video": [
"https://res.cloudinary.com/schmarty/video/upload/vc_h264/mmmgre/89/6d/9e/a4/70156d17f69db73f68a91e090d56d773a95a975b15d7ddd85fd338b5.mov"
],
"content": {
"text": "Are you getting your reps in during eternal Caturday?",
"html": "<p>Are you getting your reps in during eternal Caturday?</p>"
},
"author": {
"type": "card",
"name": "Marty McGuire",
"url": "https://martymcgui.re/",
"photo": "https://martymcgui.re/images/logo.jpg"
},
"post-type": "video",
"_id": "30579735",
"_source": "175"
}
Explain yourself @DoorDash.
{
"type": "entry",
"published": "2022-07-31T00:46:23+00:00",
"url": "https://twitter.com/cleverdevil/status/1553542557375680513",
"photo": [
"https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FY9KuJEUYAAe5jX.jpg"
],
"content": {
"text": "Explain yourself @DoorDash.",
"html": "Explain yourself <a href=\"https://twitter.com/DoorDash\">@DoorDash</a>."
},
"author": {
"type": "card",
"name": "Jonathan LaCour",
"url": "https://twitter.com/cleverdevil",
"photo": "https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1518010782369284096/7Ac_gJRN.jpg"
},
"post-type": "photo",
"_id": "30578314",
"_source": "2773"
}
102 on my front porch. In Portland. Oh, my.
{
"type": "entry",
"published": "2022-07-30T23:59:45+00:00",
"url": "https://twitter.com/karabaic/status/1553530819632713728",
"photo": [
"https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FY9AC8tUUAAGEid.jpg"
],
"content": {
"text": "102 on my front porch. In Portland. Oh, my."
},
"author": {
"type": "card",
"name": "jack the nonabrasive",
"url": "https://twitter.com/karabaic",
"photo": "https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1256785873384861696/QfRzUvne.jpg"
},
"post-type": "photo",
"_id": "30577869",
"_source": "2773"
}
I find the ensemble of The Bear much more interesting than the featured main character. I hope this folks running this show pull a reverse West Wing.
{
"type": "entry",
"published": "2022-07-30T21:47:58+00:00",
"url": "https://twitter.com/karabaic/status/1553497656122433536",
"content": {
"text": "I find the ensemble of The Bear much more interesting than the featured main character. I hope this folks running this show pull a reverse West Wing."
},
"author": {
"type": "card",
"name": "jack the nonabrasive",
"url": "https://twitter.com/karabaic",
"photo": "https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1256785873384861696/QfRzUvne.jpg"
},
"post-type": "note",
"_id": "30576707",
"_source": "2773"
}
{
"type": "entry",
"published": "2022-07-30T21:20:57+00:00",
"url": "https://twitter.com/ChrisAldrich/status/1553490858124537856",
"content": {
"text": "Is anyone practicing #sketchnotes like patterns in their #zettelkasten notes?\nboffosocko.com/2022/07/30/is-\u2026",
"html": "Is anyone practicing <a href=\"https://twitter.com/search?q=%23sketchnotes\">#sketchnotes</a> like patterns in their <a href=\"https://twitter.com/search?q=%23zettelkasten\">#zettelkasten</a> notes?\n<a href=\"https://boffosocko.com/2022/07/30/is-anyone-practicing-sketchnotes-like-patterns-in-their-notes/\">boffosocko.com/2022/07/30/is-\u2026</a>"
},
"author": {
"type": "card",
"name": "Chris Aldrich",
"url": "https://twitter.com/ChrisAldrich",
"photo": "https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/890299009381916672/CafdvvxN.jpg"
},
"post-type": "note",
"_id": "30576281",
"_source": "2773"
}
Are you putting in the effort during eternal Caturday?
{
"type": "entry",
"published": "2022-07-30T12:36:28-0400",
"url": "https://martymcgui.re/2022/07/30/123628/",
"category": [
"caturday"
],
"video": [
"https://res.cloudinary.com/schmarty/video/upload/vc_h264/mmmgre/4e/28/ee/a5/2cf548dd426bf1c9ae0cee00e81093cef144469b3157a85c977b2262.mov"
],
"content": {
"text": "Are you putting in the effort during eternal Caturday?",
"html": "<p>Are you putting in the effort during eternal Caturday?</p>"
},
"author": {
"type": "card",
"name": "Marty McGuire",
"url": "https://martymcgui.re/",
"photo": "https://martymcgui.re/images/logo.jpg"
},
"post-type": "video",
"_id": "30575411",
"_source": "175"
}
"Do not ground to a gas supply line." Hmm...
{
"type": "entry",
"published": "2022-07-30T18:40:03+00:00",
"url": "https://twitter.com/Johannes_Ernst/status/1553450363700891648",
"content": {
"text": "\"Do not ground to a gas supply line.\" Hmm..."
},
"author": {
"type": "card",
"name": "Johannes Ernst",
"url": "https://twitter.com/Johannes_Ernst",
"photo": "https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1482154224800526337/NjdX1tt7.jpg"
},
"post-type": "note",
"_id": "30574404",
"_source": "2773"
}
Wow, what a crazy finish to qualis at the #F1 #HungarianGP. Congrats to the best lad!
{
"type": "entry",
"published": "2022-07-30T17:56:35+00:00",
"url": "https://twitter.com/cleverdevil/status/1553439426964951041",
"content": {
"text": "Wow, what a crazy finish to qualis at the #F1 #HungarianGP. Congrats to the best lad!",
"html": "Wow, what a crazy finish to qualis at the <a href=\"https://twitter.com/search?q=%23F1\">#F1</a> <a href=\"https://twitter.com/search?q=%23HungarianGP\">#HungarianGP</a>. Congrats to the best lad!"
},
"author": {
"type": "card",
"name": "Jonathan LaCour",
"url": "https://twitter.com/cleverdevil",
"photo": "https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1518010782369284096/7Ac_gJRN.jpg"
},
"post-type": "note",
"_id": "30573984",
"_source": "2773"
}
I'm so thankful this is being addressed. Every time I hear atheist fundamentalist rhetoric like "religion is evil" or "we must eradicate all religion" I can't help but hear it in racist terms. Critique bad religion, yes, but don't perpetuate ignorance and bigotry while doing so.
twitter.com/c_stroop/statu…
The above is from @NiceMangos’s new article for @onlyskymedia, a must read.
Eiynah keeps the receipts on the prevalence of right-wing bigotry in certain movement athei...
{
"type": "entry",
"published": "2022-07-30T17:19:33+00:00",
"url": "https://twitter.com/jaredcwhite/status/1553430107804483584",
"quotation-of": "https://twitter.com/C_Stroop/status/1553405655674806272",
"content": {
"text": "I'm so thankful this is being addressed. Every time I hear atheist fundamentalist rhetoric like \"religion is evil\" or \"we must eradicate all religion\" I can't help but hear it in racist terms. Critique bad religion, yes, but don't perpetuate ignorance and bigotry while doing so.\ntwitter.com/c_stroop/statu\u2026",
"html": "I'm so thankful this is being addressed. Every time I hear atheist fundamentalist rhetoric like \"religion is evil\" or \"we must eradicate all religion\" I can't help but hear it in racist terms. Critique bad religion, yes, but don't perpetuate ignorance and bigotry while doing so.\n<a href=\"https://twitter.com/c_stroop/status/1553405655674806272\">twitter.com/c_stroop/statu\u2026</a>"
},
"author": {
"type": "card",
"name": "Jared White",
"url": "https://twitter.com/jaredcwhite",
"photo": "https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1431863008288931841/hsLQJBv4.jpg"
},
"post-type": "note",
"refs": {
"https://twitter.com/C_Stroop/status/1553405655674806272": {
"type": "entry",
"published": "2022-07-30T15:42:23+00:00",
"url": "https://twitter.com/C_Stroop/status/1553405655674806272",
"in-reply-to": [
"https://twitter.com/C_Stroop/status/1553405653963526144"
],
"content": {
"text": "The above is from @NiceMangos\u2019s new article for @onlyskymedia, a must read.\n\nEiynah keeps the receipts on the prevalence of right-wing bigotry in certain movement atheist spaces. And New Atheist leaders Dawkins and Harris themselves are steeped in it\n\nonlysky.media/eiynah/the-gre\u2026",
"html": "The above is from <a href=\"https://twitter.com/NiceMangos\">@NiceMangos</a>\u2019s new article for <a href=\"https://twitter.com/onlyskymedia\">@onlyskymedia</a>, a must read.\n\nEiynah keeps the receipts on the prevalence of right-wing bigotry in certain movement atheist spaces. And New Atheist leaders Dawkins and Harris themselves are steeped in it\n\n<a href=\"https://onlysky.media/eiynah/the-great-replacement-how-new-atheists-legitimized-and-spread-a-white-nationalist-conspiracy-theory/\">onlysky.media/eiynah/the-gre\u2026</a>"
},
"author": {
"type": "card",
"name": "Chrissy Stroop",
"url": "https://twitter.com/C_Stroop",
"photo": "https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1436553083182469123/b1iIY4of.jpg"
},
"post-type": "reply"
}
},
"_id": "30573716",
"_source": "2773"
}
We’re still a ways away from using post-quantum cryptographic schemes in daily practice — lots more to learn about them first.
Some post-quantum cryptography system broken (Supersingular Isogeny Diffie–Hellman protocol). Attack works in practice, taking "one hour on a single core". That was fas...
{
"type": "entry",
"published": "2022-07-30T16:29:39+00:00",
"url": "https://twitter.com/dangerdave/status/1553417549286612992",
"quotation-of": "https://twitter.com/lukOlejnik/status/1553409622891020288",
"content": {
"text": "We\u2019re still a ways away from using post-quantum cryptographic schemes in daily practice \u2014 lots more to learn about them first."
},
"author": {
"type": "card",
"name": "Dave Peck",
"url": "https://twitter.com/dangerdave",
"photo": "https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1545416408485351430/ZzEZ9NWl.jpg"
},
"post-type": "note",
"refs": {
"https://twitter.com/lukOlejnik/status/1553409622891020288": {
"type": "entry",
"published": "2022-07-30T15:58:09+00:00",
"url": "https://twitter.com/lukOlejnik/status/1553409622891020288",
"photo": [
"https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FY7RTo0XoAAUekF.png",
"https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FY7RUXmXEAIcYQb.png"
],
"content": {
"text": "Some post-quantum cryptography system broken (Supersingular Isogeny Diffie\u2013Hellman protocol). Attack works in practice, taking \"one hour on a single core\". That was fast. Highlights the importance of studying those prior to mass deployment/transition. eprint.iacr.org/2022/975.pdf",
"html": "Some post-quantum cryptography system broken (Supersingular Isogeny Diffie\u2013Hellman protocol). Attack works in practice, taking \"one hour on a single core\". That was fast. Highlights the importance of studying those prior to mass deployment/transition. <a href=\"https://eprint.iacr.org/2022/975.pdf\">eprint.iacr.org/2022/975.pdf</a>"
},
"author": {
"type": "card",
"name": "Lukasz Olejnik",
"url": "https://twitter.com/lukOlejnik",
"photo": "https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/642950693532270592/ECQCfulT.jpg"
},
"post-type": "photo"
}
},
"_id": "30572878",
"_source": "2773"
}
Bike to ice skate for @pedalpalooza last night
{
"type": "entry",
"published": "2022-07-30T14:41:25+00:00",
"url": "https://twitter.com/anomalily/status/1553390313271484416",
"photo": [
"https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FY7AMlBUsAM4vNz.jpg"
],
"content": {
"text": "Bike to ice skate for @pedalpalooza last night",
"html": "Bike to ice skate for <a href=\"https://twitter.com/pedalpalooza\">@pedalpalooza</a> last night"
},
"author": {
"type": "card",
"name": "Lillian Karabaic",
"url": "https://twitter.com/anomalily",
"photo": "https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1455236306162761732/jPv9ROKG.jpg"
},
"post-type": "photo",
"_id": "30571161",
"_source": "2773"
}
{
"type": "entry",
"author": {
"name": null,
"url": "https://herestomwiththeweather.com/",
"photo": null
},
"url": "https://herestomwiththeweather.com/2022/07/29/p-hacking-example/",
"published": "2022-07-29T21:09:37+00:00",
"content": {
"html": "<p>One of the most interesting lessons from the pandemic is the harm that can be caused by <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_dredging\">p-hacking</a>. A paper with errors related to p-hacking that hasn\u2019t been peer-reviewed is promoted by one or more people with millions of followers on social media and then some of those followers suffer horrible outcomes because they had a false sense of security. Maybe the authors of the paper did not even realize the problem but for whatever reason, the social media rock stars felt the need to spread the misinformation. And another very interesting lesson is that the social media rock stars seem to almost never issue a correction after the paper is reviewed and rejected.</p>\n\n<p>To illustrate p-hacking with a non-serious example, I am using real public data with my experience attending drop-in hockey.</p>\n\n<p>I wanted to know if goalies tended to show up more or less frequently on any particular day of the week because it is more fun to play when at least one goalie shows up. I collected 85 independent samples.</p>\n\n<p>For all days, there were 27 days with 1 goalie and 27 days with 2 goalies and 31 days with 0 goalies.</p>\n\n<p>Our test procedure will define the test statistic X = the number of days that at least one goalie registered.</p>\n\n<p>I am not smart so instead of committing to a hypothesis to test prior to looking at the data, I cheat and look at the data first and notice that the numbers for Tuesday look especially low. So, I focus on goalie registrations on Tuesdays. Using the data above for all days, the null hypothesis is that the probability that at least one goalie registered on a Tuesday is 0.635.</p>\n\n<p>For perspective, taking 19 samples for Tuesday would give an expected value of 12 samples where at least 1 goalie registered.</p>\n\n<p>Suppose we wanted to propose an alternative hypothesis that p < 0.635 for Tuesday. What is the rejection region of values that would refute the null hypothesis (p=0.635)?</p>\n\n<p>Let\u2019s aim for \u03b1 = 0.05 as the level of significance. This means that (pretending that I had not egregiously cherry-picked data beforehand) we want there to be less than a 5% chance that the experimental result would occur inside the rejection region if the null hypothesis was true (Type I error).</p>\n\n<p>For a binomial random variable X, the pmf b(x; n, p) is</p>\n\n\n\n<pre><code>def factorial(n)\n (1..n).inject(:*) || 1\nend\n\ndef combination(n,k)\n factorial(n) / (factorial(k)*factorial(n-k))\nend\n\ndef pmf(x,n,p)\n combination(n,x) * (p ** x) * ((1 - p) ** (n-x))\nend\n</code></pre>\n\n<p>The cdf B(x; n, p) = P(X x) is</p>\n\n\n\n<pre><code>def cdf(x,n,p)\n (0..x).map {|i| pmf(i,n,p)}.sum\nend\n</code></pre>\n\n\n<p>For n=19 samples, if x 9 was chosen as the rejection region, then \u03b1 = P(X 9 when X ~ Bin(19, 0.635)) = 0.112</p>\n\n<pre><code>2.4.10 :001 > load 'stats.rb'\n => true \n2.4.10 :002 > cdf(9,19,0.635)\n => 0.1121416295262306 \n</code></pre>\n\n<p>This choice is not good enough because even if the null hypothesis is true, there is a large 11% chance (again, pretending I had not cherry-picked the data) that the test statistic falls in the rejection region.</p>\n\n<p>So, if we narrow the rejection region to x 8, then \u03b1 = P(X 8 when X ~ Bin(19, 0.635)) = 0.047</p>\n\n<pre><code>2.4.10 :003 > cdf(8,19,0.635)\n => 0.04705965393607316\n</code></pre>\n\n\n<p>This rejection region satisfies the requirement of a 0.05 significance level.</p>\n\n<p>The n=19 samples for Tuesday are [0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 2, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 2, 2, 0, 0].</p>\n\n<p>Since x=8 falls within the rejection region, the null hypothesis is (supposedly) rejected for Tuesday samples. So I announce to my hockey friends on social media \u201cBeware! Compared to all days of the week, it is less likely that at least one goalie will register on a Tuesday!\u201d</p>\n\n<p><img src=\"https://coffeebucks.s3.amazonaws.com/nope_not_how_it_works.jpg\" alt=\"Nope, not how it works\" /></p>\n\n<p>Before addressing the p-hacking, let\u2019s first address another issue. The experimental result was x = 8 which gave us a 0.047 probability of obtaining 8 or less days in a sample of 19 assuming that the null hypothesis (p=0.635) is true. This result just barely makes the 0.05 cutoff by the skin of its teeth. So, just saying that the null hypothesis was refuted with \u03b1 = 0.05 does not reveal that it was barely refuted. Therefore, it is much more informative to say the <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-value\">p-value</a> was 0.047 and also does not impose a particular \u03b1 on readers who want to draw their own conclusions.</p>\n\n<p>Now let\u2019s discuss the p-hacking problem. I gave myself the impression that there was only a 5% chance that I would see a significant result even if the null hypothesis (p=0.635) were true. However, since there is data for 5 days (Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday), I could have performed 5 different tests. If I chose that same p < 0.635 alternative hypothesis for each, then there would similarly be a 5% chance of a significant result for each test. The probability that all 5 tests would not be significant would be 0.95 * 0.95 * 0.95 * 0.95 * 0.95 = 0.77. Therefore, the probability that at least one test would be significant is 1 - 0.77 = 0.23 (the <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family-wise_error_rate\">Family-wise error rate</a>) which is much higher than 0.05. That\u2019s like flipping a coin twice and getting two heads which is not surprising at all. We should expect such a result even if the null hypothesis is true. Therefore, there is not a significant result for Tuesday.</p>\n\n<p>I was inspired to write this blog post after watching <a href=\"https://twitter.com/DrSusanOliver1\">Dr. Susan Oliver</a>\u2019s <a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=drSAsfuMkuw\">Antivaxxers fooled by P-Hacking and apples to oranges comparisons</a>. The video references the paper <a href=\"https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1002106\">The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science</a> (2015).</p>",
"text": "One of the most interesting lessons from the pandemic is the harm that can be caused by p-hacking. A paper with errors related to p-hacking that hasn\u2019t been peer-reviewed is promoted by one or more people with millions of followers on social media and then some of those followers suffer horrible outcomes because they had a false sense of security. Maybe the authors of the paper did not even realize the problem but for whatever reason, the social media rock stars felt the need to spread the misinformation. And another very interesting lesson is that the social media rock stars seem to almost never issue a correction after the paper is reviewed and rejected.\n\nTo illustrate p-hacking with a non-serious example, I am using real public data with my experience attending drop-in hockey.\n\nI wanted to know if goalies tended to show up more or less frequently on any particular day of the week because it is more fun to play when at least one goalie shows up. I collected 85 independent samples.\n\nFor all days, there were 27 days with 1 goalie and 27 days with 2 goalies and 31 days with 0 goalies.\n\nOur test procedure will define the test statistic X = the number of days that at least one goalie registered.\n\nI am not smart so instead of committing to a hypothesis to test prior to looking at the data, I cheat and look at the data first and notice that the numbers for Tuesday look especially low. So, I focus on goalie registrations on Tuesdays. Using the data above for all days, the null hypothesis is that the probability that at least one goalie registered on a Tuesday is 0.635.\n\nFor perspective, taking 19 samples for Tuesday would give an expected value of 12 samples where at least 1 goalie registered.\n\nSuppose we wanted to propose an alternative hypothesis that p < 0.635 for Tuesday. What is the rejection region of values that would refute the null hypothesis (p=0.635)?\n\nLet\u2019s aim for \u03b1 = 0.05 as the level of significance. This means that (pretending that I had not egregiously cherry-picked data beforehand) we want there to be less than a 5% chance that the experimental result would occur inside the rejection region if the null hypothesis was true (Type I error).\n\nFor a binomial random variable X, the pmf b(x; n, p) is\n\n\n\ndef factorial(n)\n (1..n).inject(:*) || 1\nend\n\ndef combination(n,k)\n factorial(n) / (factorial(k)*factorial(n-k))\nend\n\ndef pmf(x,n,p)\n combination(n,x) * (p ** x) * ((1 - p) ** (n-x))\nend\n\n\nThe cdf B(x; n, p) = P(X x) is\n\n\n\ndef cdf(x,n,p)\n (0..x).map {|i| pmf(i,n,p)}.sum\nend\n\n\n\nFor n=19 samples, if x 9 was chosen as the rejection region, then \u03b1 = P(X 9 when X ~ Bin(19, 0.635)) = 0.112\n\n2.4.10 :001 > load 'stats.rb'\n => true \n2.4.10 :002 > cdf(9,19,0.635)\n => 0.1121416295262306 \n\n\nThis choice is not good enough because even if the null hypothesis is true, there is a large 11% chance (again, pretending I had not cherry-picked the data) that the test statistic falls in the rejection region.\n\nSo, if we narrow the rejection region to x 8, then \u03b1 = P(X 8 when X ~ Bin(19, 0.635)) = 0.047\n\n2.4.10 :003 > cdf(8,19,0.635)\n => 0.04705965393607316\n\n\n\nThis rejection region satisfies the requirement of a 0.05 significance level.\n\nThe n=19 samples for Tuesday are [0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 2, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 2, 2, 0, 0].\n\nSince x=8 falls within the rejection region, the null hypothesis is (supposedly) rejected for Tuesday samples. So I announce to my hockey friends on social media \u201cBeware! Compared to all days of the week, it is less likely that at least one goalie will register on a Tuesday!\u201d\n\n\n\nBefore addressing the p-hacking, let\u2019s first address another issue. The experimental result was x = 8 which gave us a 0.047 probability of obtaining 8 or less days in a sample of 19 assuming that the null hypothesis (p=0.635) is true. This result just barely makes the 0.05 cutoff by the skin of its teeth. So, just saying that the null hypothesis was refuted with \u03b1 = 0.05 does not reveal that it was barely refuted. Therefore, it is much more informative to say the p-value was 0.047 and also does not impose a particular \u03b1 on readers who want to draw their own conclusions.\n\nNow let\u2019s discuss the p-hacking problem. I gave myself the impression that there was only a 5% chance that I would see a significant result even if the null hypothesis (p=0.635) were true. However, since there is data for 5 days (Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday), I could have performed 5 different tests. If I chose that same p < 0.635 alternative hypothesis for each, then there would similarly be a 5% chance of a significant result for each test. The probability that all 5 tests would not be significant would be 0.95 * 0.95 * 0.95 * 0.95 * 0.95 = 0.77. Therefore, the probability that at least one test would be significant is 1 - 0.77 = 0.23 (the Family-wise error rate) which is much higher than 0.05. That\u2019s like flipping a coin twice and getting two heads which is not surprising at all. We should expect such a result even if the null hypothesis is true. Therefore, there is not a significant result for Tuesday.\n\nI was inspired to write this blog post after watching Dr. Susan Oliver\u2019s Antivaxxers fooled by P-Hacking and apples to oranges comparisons. The video references the paper The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science (2015)."
},
"name": "P-Hacking Example",
"post-type": "article",
"_id": "30567021",
"_source": "246"
}
I honestly don't get it. I don't care for Ben Affleck as Batman at all. And he's merely passable as Bruce Wayne. Leave the poor man alone!
#MakeTheBatfleckMovie trended hard on Twitter Friday. wegotthiscovered.com/movies/yes-the…
{
"type": "entry",
"published": "2022-07-30T05:28:38+00:00",
"url": "https://twitter.com/jaredcwhite/status/1553251199796649984",
"quotation-of": "https://twitter.com/DCFansUnited/status/1553230043865702400",
"content": {
"text": "I honestly don't get it. I don't care for Ben Affleck as Batman at all. And he's merely passable as Bruce Wayne. Leave the poor man alone!"
},
"author": {
"type": "card",
"name": "Jared White",
"url": "https://twitter.com/jaredcwhite",
"photo": "https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1431863008288931841/hsLQJBv4.jpg"
},
"post-type": "note",
"refs": {
"https://twitter.com/DCFansUnited/status/1553230043865702400": {
"type": "entry",
"published": "2022-07-30T04:04:34+00:00",
"url": "https://twitter.com/DCFansUnited/status/1553230043865702400",
"content": {
"text": "#MakeTheBatfleckMovie trended hard on Twitter Friday. wegotthiscovered.com/movies/yes-the\u2026",
"html": "<a href=\"https://twitter.com/search?q=%23MakeTheBatfleckMovie\">#MakeTheBatfleckMovie</a> trended hard on Twitter Friday. <a href=\"https://wegotthiscovered.com/movies/yes-the-campaign-for-ben-afflecks-batman-movie-has-restarted-again/?utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=dlvr.it&utm_term=dcfans\">wegotthiscovered.com/movies/yes-the\u2026</a>"
},
"author": {
"type": "card",
"name": "DC Fans",
"url": "https://twitter.com/DCFansUnited",
"photo": "https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1071201665695580161/TTqlQ9Te.jpg"
},
"post-type": "note"
}
},
"_id": "30566001",
"_source": "2773"
}
{
"type": "entry",
"author": {
"name": "Cathie",
"url": "https://cathieleblanc.com/",
"photo": null
},
"url": "https://cathieleblanc.com/2022/07/29/astrophotography-and-teaching/",
"published": "2022-07-29T22:29:27-04:00",
"content": {
"html": "<p>I have been interested in photography for years. I have a good understanding of composition, the exposure triangle, depth of field, and many other photographic concepts as well as how to choose lenses and manipulate the settings of my various cameras to make photos that I find interesting. For the last three plus years (today is day 1215), I have engaged in a <a href=\"https://cathieleblanc.com/daily-photo/\">daily photo project</a> that has taught me how to really look at ordinary things as well as how valuable consistent engagement is for improving skills. I try to challenge myself every day with this project but I was starting to feel like I wasn\u2019t learning a whole lot of new lessons related to photography. So I decided to try my hand at astrophotography. I am learning lots of new lessons about photography but I am really surprised about how much I\u2019m learning about teaching by engaging in this new hobby.</p>\n<p>Astrophotography involves making photos of celestial objects and phenomena. Celestial objects are things like the moon, the planets, the Milky Way, stars, galaxies, comets, and satellites. Celestial phenomena are things like phases of the moon, one celestial body eclipsing another, meteor showers, and planetary alignments. Photographing these objects and phenomena is more challenging than photographing nearly any other object. They are typically dim and far away and, therefore, they emit little light. Photography is all about capturing light on film or on a sensor. So dim, far-away things are a particular challenge to photograph. The amount of light we capture depends on 3 things (the exposure triangle): ISO (how sensitive the film or sensor is to light), aperture (how wide open the shutter is), and exposure time (how long the shutter is left open). To capture enough light to be able to see details of celestial objects and phenomena, we often we need to use very high ISOs which introduces noise or graininess into the image and/or we have to use very large apertures which means we have a very narrow window of focus and/or we have to use very long exposure times (slow shutter speeds) which introduces the possibility of undesired movement in either our subject or our camera causing blurriness. This exposure triangle is something we have to deal with in other kinds of photography as well but we can often make very good photographs even if we make small mistakes. Astrophotography is much less forgiving. And so there are a lot of tools available to minimize those mistakes. And lots of tips about how to use these tools effectively. This makes the astrophotography learning curve long and pretty steep. I\u2019ll stop trying to convince you that astrophotography is different than other kinds of photography. Just know that it is.</p>\n<p>When I decided a couple of months ago that I wanted to venture into this new kind of photography, I started reading some blogs posts and watching some videos about how to get started using the equipment that I own. The problem that I ran into was that the advice was scattered and overwhelming and not all of it seemed to apply to my particular situation. There was no consistency and I couldn\u2019t find an easy path to my first step. So I decided to buy a book. Retro, I know. I bought <a href=\"http://www.covingtoninnovations.com/dslr/\"><em>Digital SLR Astrophotography</em></a> by Michael A. Covington. From this experience, I (re)learned the lesson that we need to <strong>provide on-ramps to new knowledge for our students</strong>. How can we help them make sense of the mass of new content and skills that we are trying to teach them? How can we help them to build mental models that connect the content and skills we\u2019re teaching with what they already know?</p>\n<p>From the Covington book, I learned some basics. For example, I learned the difference between a star tracker and an equatorial mount and since I don\u2019t have either, I learned that to estimate the longest shutter speed I can use without starting to get unwanted star trails as a result of the rotation of the earth, divide 500 by the focal length of my lens. With my newly acquired knowledge, I felt pretty confident that I could go out and make some photos of easy targets. I decided to start with my 50mm lens to make a photo of the Big Dipper. Since the focal length of my lens is 50mm, I knew that my shutter speed could be no slower than 10 seconds (500/50mm=10 seconds). I made this image of the Big Dipper and am really happy with it. The stars don\u2019t have trails and there is no noise in the background. And this photo got me really excited to target something a bit more difficult. This is the second lesson I learned. It\u2019s important to <strong>provide opportunities for some early, not-too-easy successes so that students are challenged and excited rather than frustrated and discouraged. </strong></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://i0.wp.com/cathieleblanc.com/wp-content/uploads/wp-1659142243635.jpg?resize=1024%2C673&ssl=1\" alt=\"image of the Big Dipper\" /></p>\n<p>As my next, more difficult astrophotography target, I chose Saturn. I had seen a lot of photos made by amateurs that showed amazing detail in the rings around the planet. I pointed my 50mm lens toward the planet and made an image that showed Saturn as a small dot. I knew from the Covington book that I could use various kinds of image processing software to try to pull details out of that small dot, to try to make the rings and other planetary details visible. This post-processing is something that I am working on but I thought I might be able to get more detail in the unprocessed image if I used a bigger lens (more magnification). So I switched to my 100mm lens and made the following image.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://i0.wp.com/cathieleblanc.com/wp-content/uploads/saturn-trail.jpg?resize=1024%2C683&ssl=1\" alt=\"Saturn trail\" /></p>\n<p>This image has the kind of trail that I was talking about earlier in this post. When I made the image, I kept my shutter speed at 10 seconds which I had used with my 50mm lens. But the 500 rule says that the slowest shutter speed I can use with a 100mm lens is 5 seconds (500/100mm=5 seconds) in order to avoid capturing the rotation of the earth in relation to the celestial objects. I knew this rule but in the excitement of making an image of a new target, I forgot it. I think there are two lessons here: <strong>1. Having already \u201ccovered\u201d material doesn\u2019t mean that students have internalized it to the point where they won\u2019t forget it; and, 2. it\u2019s important for students to be able to see their mistakes for themselves.</strong> How can we help students internalize the content and skills from our classes? How can we make mistakes visible to our not-yet-expert students so they can find the mistakes themselves?</p>\n<p>I then set the shutter speed to the correct 5 seconds but I still couldn\u2019t seem to get a clear image of Saturn. So I decided to try to recreate my successful image of a constellation using this lens. I targeted Cassiopeia and made the following image. Notice how strange the stars look. Nothing I did seemed to fix those stars.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://i0.wp.com/cathieleblanc.com/wp-content/uploads/IMG_4152.jpg?resize=1024%2C683&ssl=1\" alt=\"\" /></p>\n<p>One of the resources I had discovered before I bought the Covington book was a Facebook group devoted to learning astrophotography. I had lurked there for a while and learned a lot from the images members posted and the feedback from other members. Because I had exhausted all of my ideas about what was wrong with my photo of Cassiopeia, I decided to ask for ideas in this group. Although I am a confident learner, I was nervous about putting my mistakes out in front of others who are learning astrophotography. My lesson here is that <strong>it is scary to make yourself vulnerable by admitting what you don\u2019t know in communities where you haven\u2019t yet built trust</strong>. How can we help students to trust not just us as the instructor but also the other students in the class so that they are willing to ask questions about what they don\u2019t know?</p>\n<p>I posted my photo along with a question about what might be going wrong in the photo. The responses started within minutes. The first several just said \u201cfocus.\u201d This was not a particularly helpful response because I had set the focus on my lens to infinity which should mean any stars would be in focus. This made me think about the feedback I give to my students on their work. <strong>Feedback should be clear, constructive, and actionable</strong>. In other words, feedback should be more than a single word. It should contain an explanation of what is wrong and, most importantly, how to fix it. One of the responses I received said, \u201cObviously, the problem is focus.\u201d The word \u201cobviously\u201d is problematic here. If the answer was obvious, I wouldn\u2019t have asked the question. <strong>To a beginner, nothing is obvious. Feedback should not make students feel badly about asking their question</strong>. No matter how many times you have received this question, it is the first time the student has asked it. At this point, I thought about removing my question because it felt like an embarrassing mistake. How could I not have focused the image? Stupid, right? But then I started to get responses that made it clear that focusing dark images like this is really challenging. The best responses gave me specific things I could do and/or think about when focusing. For example, one person told me that focusing on infinity is rarely achieved by moving the lens to what feels like infinity. Sure enough\u2013when I tried focusing on infinity in the daylight with this lens, the best results came just before I thought I was at infinity. In astrophotography, focus is not a \u201cclose enough\u201d endeavor. It has to be exact. Another person suggested that I get a bahtinov mask, a simple, cheap tool that I had never heard of, to help with focusing. A third person suggested the thing that I think was causing most of my problem. He asked if I had vibration reduction turned on in either my camera or my lens. I did. Turning this off is critical for astrophotography and I didn\u2019t know that. <strong>Feedback should include specific actions to take in order to make improvement</strong>. After focusing this lens, I took some photos tonight and the stars in my photos are sharp now. So focus was indeed the issue with my previous attempts. I look forward to trying my newly focused lens on Saturn but there are clouds in the way at the moment. I\u2019m glad that I was able to test out my solutions to the focus problem before conditions were perfect for it. And that\u2019s perhaps the last lesson for this post. <strong>Give students lots of opportunities to practice applying content and new skills</strong>. Don\u2019t just wait for the perfect condition of an exam.</p>\n<p>A follow-up that I\u2019m still trying to process: I got a 24 hour suspension from the learning astrophotography Facebook group after posting my question. First, the post was marked as spam and removed. Then, when I questioned that decision in the group, my new question was deemed unrelated to learning astrophotography (which I agree with) so I was suspended for 24 hours. There is no indication as to why my question regarding the look of the stars in my image was marked as spam. Others must have had this experience recently because one of the admins just posted this:</p>\n<blockquote><p>Just a quick suggestion to those whinging about some members telling other members to google things and the apparent rudeness of not being able to access the answers to some of the questions they ask \u2013 but pls be reminded this is an \u2018astrophotography\u2019 group. It would be handy to learn a little about telescope operation basics, maybe a bit of visual astronomy or general astronomy and possibly photography before jumping into astrophotography and interacting here in this group. Just a suggestion.</p></blockquote>\n<p>I don\u2019t have an articulate response to this yet. But I\u2019ll just say that \u201clearning\u201d is in the name of the group as well. I\u2019m sure there\u2019s a lesson about teaching here.</p>\n<p>The featured image is Jupiter Rising, taken by me on July 27, 2022, with my 50mm lens.</p>",
"text": "I have been interested in photography for years. I have a good understanding of composition, the exposure triangle, depth of field, and many other photographic concepts as well as how to choose lenses and manipulate the settings of my various cameras to make photos that I find interesting. For the last three plus years (today is day 1215), I have engaged in a daily photo project that has taught me how to really look at ordinary things as well as how valuable consistent engagement is for improving skills. I try to challenge myself every day with this project but I was starting to feel like I wasn\u2019t learning a whole lot of new lessons related to photography. So I decided to try my hand at astrophotography. I am learning lots of new lessons about photography but I am really surprised about how much I\u2019m learning about teaching by engaging in this new hobby.\nAstrophotography involves making photos of celestial objects and phenomena. Celestial objects are things like the moon, the planets, the Milky Way, stars, galaxies, comets, and satellites. Celestial phenomena are things like phases of the moon, one celestial body eclipsing another, meteor showers, and planetary alignments. Photographing these objects and phenomena is more challenging than photographing nearly any other object. They are typically dim and far away and, therefore, they emit little light. Photography is all about capturing light on film or on a sensor. So dim, far-away things are a particular challenge to photograph. The amount of light we capture depends on 3 things (the exposure triangle): ISO (how sensitive the film or sensor is to light), aperture (how wide open the shutter is), and exposure time (how long the shutter is left open). To capture enough light to be able to see details of celestial objects and phenomena, we often we need to use very high ISOs which introduces noise or graininess into the image and/or we have to use very large apertures which means we have a very narrow window of focus and/or we have to use very long exposure times (slow shutter speeds) which introduces the possibility of undesired movement in either our subject or our camera causing blurriness. This exposure triangle is something we have to deal with in other kinds of photography as well but we can often make very good photographs even if we make small mistakes. Astrophotography is much less forgiving. And so there are a lot of tools available to minimize those mistakes. And lots of tips about how to use these tools effectively. This makes the astrophotography learning curve long and pretty steep. I\u2019ll stop trying to convince you that astrophotography is different than other kinds of photography. Just know that it is.\nWhen I decided a couple of months ago that I wanted to venture into this new kind of photography, I started reading some blogs posts and watching some videos about how to get started using the equipment that I own. The problem that I ran into was that the advice was scattered and overwhelming and not all of it seemed to apply to my particular situation. There was no consistency and I couldn\u2019t find an easy path to my first step. So I decided to buy a book. Retro, I know. I bought Digital SLR Astrophotography by Michael A. Covington. From this experience, I (re)learned the lesson that we need to provide on-ramps to new knowledge for our students. How can we help them make sense of the mass of new content and skills that we are trying to teach them? How can we help them to build mental models that connect the content and skills we\u2019re teaching with what they already know?\nFrom the Covington book, I learned some basics. For example, I learned the difference between a star tracker and an equatorial mount and since I don\u2019t have either, I learned that to estimate the longest shutter speed I can use without starting to get unwanted star trails as a result of the rotation of the earth, divide 500 by the focal length of my lens. With my newly acquired knowledge, I felt pretty confident that I could go out and make some photos of easy targets. I decided to start with my 50mm lens to make a photo of the Big Dipper. Since the focal length of my lens is 50mm, I knew that my shutter speed could be no slower than 10 seconds (500/50mm=10 seconds). I made this image of the Big Dipper and am really happy with it. The stars don\u2019t have trails and there is no noise in the background. And this photo got me really excited to target something a bit more difficult. This is the second lesson I learned. It\u2019s important to provide opportunities for some early, not-too-easy successes so that students are challenged and excited rather than frustrated and discouraged. \n\nAs my next, more difficult astrophotography target, I chose Saturn. I had seen a lot of photos made by amateurs that showed amazing detail in the rings around the planet. I pointed my 50mm lens toward the planet and made an image that showed Saturn as a small dot. I knew from the Covington book that I could use various kinds of image processing software to try to pull details out of that small dot, to try to make the rings and other planetary details visible. This post-processing is something that I am working on but I thought I might be able to get more detail in the unprocessed image if I used a bigger lens (more magnification). So I switched to my 100mm lens and made the following image.\n\nThis image has the kind of trail that I was talking about earlier in this post. When I made the image, I kept my shutter speed at 10 seconds which I had used with my 50mm lens. But the 500 rule says that the slowest shutter speed I can use with a 100mm lens is 5 seconds (500/100mm=5 seconds) in order to avoid capturing the rotation of the earth in relation to the celestial objects. I knew this rule but in the excitement of making an image of a new target, I forgot it. I think there are two lessons here: 1. Having already \u201ccovered\u201d material doesn\u2019t mean that students have internalized it to the point where they won\u2019t forget it; and, 2. it\u2019s important for students to be able to see their mistakes for themselves. How can we help students internalize the content and skills from our classes? How can we make mistakes visible to our not-yet-expert students so they can find the mistakes themselves?\nI then set the shutter speed to the correct 5 seconds but I still couldn\u2019t seem to get a clear image of Saturn. So I decided to try to recreate my successful image of a constellation using this lens. I targeted Cassiopeia and made the following image. Notice how strange the stars look. Nothing I did seemed to fix those stars.\n\nOne of the resources I had discovered before I bought the Covington book was a Facebook group devoted to learning astrophotography. I had lurked there for a while and learned a lot from the images members posted and the feedback from other members. Because I had exhausted all of my ideas about what was wrong with my photo of Cassiopeia, I decided to ask for ideas in this group. Although I am a confident learner, I was nervous about putting my mistakes out in front of others who are learning astrophotography. My lesson here is that it is scary to make yourself vulnerable by admitting what you don\u2019t know in communities where you haven\u2019t yet built trust. How can we help students to trust not just us as the instructor but also the other students in the class so that they are willing to ask questions about what they don\u2019t know?\nI posted my photo along with a question about what might be going wrong in the photo. The responses started within minutes. The first several just said \u201cfocus.\u201d This was not a particularly helpful response because I had set the focus on my lens to infinity which should mean any stars would be in focus. This made me think about the feedback I give to my students on their work. Feedback should be clear, constructive, and actionable. In other words, feedback should be more than a single word. It should contain an explanation of what is wrong and, most importantly, how to fix it. One of the responses I received said, \u201cObviously, the problem is focus.\u201d The word \u201cobviously\u201d is problematic here. If the answer was obvious, I wouldn\u2019t have asked the question. To a beginner, nothing is obvious. Feedback should not make students feel badly about asking their question. No matter how many times you have received this question, it is the first time the student has asked it. At this point, I thought about removing my question because it felt like an embarrassing mistake. How could I not have focused the image? Stupid, right? But then I started to get responses that made it clear that focusing dark images like this is really challenging. The best responses gave me specific things I could do and/or think about when focusing. For example, one person told me that focusing on infinity is rarely achieved by moving the lens to what feels like infinity. Sure enough\u2013when I tried focusing on infinity in the daylight with this lens, the best results came just before I thought I was at infinity. In astrophotography, focus is not a \u201cclose enough\u201d endeavor. It has to be exact. Another person suggested that I get a bahtinov mask, a simple, cheap tool that I had never heard of, to help with focusing. A third person suggested the thing that I think was causing most of my problem. He asked if I had vibration reduction turned on in either my camera or my lens. I did. Turning this off is critical for astrophotography and I didn\u2019t know that. Feedback should include specific actions to take in order to make improvement. After focusing this lens, I took some photos tonight and the stars in my photos are sharp now. So focus was indeed the issue with my previous attempts. I look forward to trying my newly focused lens on Saturn but there are clouds in the way at the moment. I\u2019m glad that I was able to test out my solutions to the focus problem before conditions were perfect for it. And that\u2019s perhaps the last lesson for this post. Give students lots of opportunities to practice applying content and new skills. Don\u2019t just wait for the perfect condition of an exam.\nA follow-up that I\u2019m still trying to process: I got a 24 hour suspension from the learning astrophotography Facebook group after posting my question. First, the post was marked as spam and removed. Then, when I questioned that decision in the group, my new question was deemed unrelated to learning astrophotography (which I agree with) so I was suspended for 24 hours. There is no indication as to why my question regarding the look of the stars in my image was marked as spam. Others must have had this experience recently because one of the admins just posted this:\nJust a quick suggestion to those whinging about some members telling other members to google things and the apparent rudeness of not being able to access the answers to some of the questions they ask \u2013 but pls be reminded this is an \u2018astrophotography\u2019 group. It would be handy to learn a little about telescope operation basics, maybe a bit of visual astronomy or general astronomy and possibly photography before jumping into astrophotography and interacting here in this group. Just a suggestion.\nI don\u2019t have an articulate response to this yet. But I\u2019ll just say that \u201clearning\u201d is in the name of the group as well. I\u2019m sure there\u2019s a lesson about teaching here.\nThe featured image is Jupiter Rising, taken by me on July 27, 2022, with my 50mm lens."
},
"name": "Astrophotography and Teaching",
"post-type": "article",
"_id": "30565731",
"_source": "2782"
}
"Test passed." There must be a mistake.
{
"type": "entry",
"published": "2022-07-30T00:14:05+00:00",
"url": "https://twitter.com/Johannes_Ernst/status/1553172039019552769",
"content": {
"text": "\"Test passed.\" There must be a mistake."
},
"author": {
"type": "card",
"name": "Johannes Ernst",
"url": "https://twitter.com/Johannes_Ernst",
"photo": "https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1482154224800526337/NjdX1tt7.jpg"
},
"post-type": "note",
"_id": "30563565",
"_source": "2773"
}
Somebody should work on this #identity thing. Got an e-mail, supposedly from a class action settlement, domain …ingsomethingclassactionsettlement.com -- now how can I possibly know whether this is legit or a drive-by attack? The URLs in the e-mail are all hiding behind a tracking redirect.
{
"type": "entry",
"published": "2022-07-29T21:19:24+00:00",
"url": "https://twitter.com/Johannes_Ernst/status/1553128078792019969",
"content": {
"text": "Somebody should work on this #identity thing. Got an e-mail, supposedly from a class action settlement, domain \u2026ingsomethingclassactionsettlement.com -- now how can I possibly know whether this is legit or a drive-by attack? The URLs in the e-mail are all hiding behind a tracking redirect.",
"html": "Somebody should work on this <a href=\"https://twitter.com/search?q=%23identity\">#identity</a> thing. Got an e-mail, supposedly from a class action settlement, domain <a href=\"http://somethingsomethingclassactionsettlement.com\">\u2026ingsomethingclassactionsettlement.com</a> -- now how can I possibly know whether this is legit or a drive-by attack? The URLs in the e-mail are all hiding behind a tracking redirect."
},
"author": {
"type": "card",
"name": "Johannes Ernst",
"url": "https://twitter.com/Johannes_Ernst",
"photo": "https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1482154224800526337/NjdX1tt7.jpg"
},
"post-type": "note",
"_id": "30561481",
"_source": "2773"
}
I made a playlist for the Bike to Ice Skate ride tonight 😂
{
"type": "entry",
"published": "2022-07-29T21:11:41+00:00",
"url": "https://twitter.com/anomalily/status/1553126135847743488",
"photo": [
"https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FY3P6-wUYAA5KMB.jpg"
],
"content": {
"text": "I made a playlist for the Bike to Ice Skate ride tonight \ud83d\ude02"
},
"author": {
"type": "card",
"name": "Lillian Karabaic",
"url": "https://twitter.com/anomalily",
"photo": "https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1455236306162761732/jPv9ROKG.jpg"
},
"post-type": "photo",
"_id": "30561209",
"_source": "2773"
}
Congrats to @flydotio on their Series B.
I’ve been pretty focused on the “static CDN + a light layer of server infra running on managed VMs” project type (aka Render).
But in the future, I could definitely see simply deploying server containers here and there around the world.
{
"type": "entry",
"published": "2022-07-29T20:44:11+00:00",
"url": "https://twitter.com/jaredcwhite/status/1553119215573274624",
"content": {
"text": "Congrats to @flydotio on their Series B.\n\nI\u2019ve been pretty focused on the \u201cstatic CDN + a light layer of server infra running on managed VMs\u201d project type (aka Render).\n\nBut in the future, I could definitely see simply deploying server containers here and there around the world.",
"html": "Congrats to <a href=\"https://twitter.com/flydotio\">@flydotio</a> on their Series B.\n\nI\u2019ve been pretty focused on the \u201cstatic CDN + a light layer of server infra running on managed VMs\u201d project type (aka Render).\n\nBut in the future, I could definitely see simply deploying server containers here and there around the world."
},
"author": {
"type": "card",
"name": "Jared White",
"url": "https://twitter.com/jaredcwhite",
"photo": "https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1431863008288931841/hsLQJBv4.jpg"
},
"post-type": "note",
"_id": "30560906",
"_source": "2773"
}
This is comlicated. Darn.
{
"type": "entry",
"published": "2022-07-29T20:41:48+00:00",
"url": "https://twitter.com/Johannes_Ernst/status/1553118616794501120",
"content": {
"text": "This is comlicated. Darn."
},
"author": {
"type": "card",
"name": "Johannes Ernst",
"url": "https://twitter.com/Johannes_Ernst",
"photo": "https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1482154224800526337/NjdX1tt7.jpg"
},
"post-type": "note",
"_id": "30560907",
"_source": "2773"
}
And not just the vlog, but other videos are starting to roll out as well!
Like my review of Nope (2022), an atmospheric tour de force by the immensely talented Jordan Peele.
Check it out: youtube.com/watch?v=RPpjGr…
After a hiatus of nearly a year…the vlog has returned!
Welcome to Season 6, Episode 1 of Essential Life with Jared.
A stroll along Portland’s South Waterfront, maki...
{
"type": "entry",
"published": "2022-07-29T18:24:11+00:00",
"url": "https://twitter.com/jaredcwhite/status/1553083986015973377",
"quotation-of": "https://twitter.com/jaredcwhite/status/1553023336342466562",
"content": {
"text": "And not just the vlog, but other videos are starting to roll out as well!\n\nLike my review of Nope (2022), an atmospheric tour de force by the immensely talented Jordan Peele.\n\nCheck it out: youtube.com/watch?v=RPpjGr\u2026",
"html": "And not just the vlog, but other videos are starting to roll out as well!\n\nLike my review of Nope (2022), an atmospheric tour de force by the immensely talented Jordan Peele.\n\nCheck it out: <a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RPpjGriJpvk\">youtube.com/watch?v=RPpjGr\u2026</a>"
},
"author": {
"type": "card",
"name": "Jared White",
"url": "https://twitter.com/jaredcwhite",
"photo": "https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1431863008288931841/hsLQJBv4.jpg"
},
"post-type": "note",
"refs": {
"https://twitter.com/jaredcwhite/status/1553023336342466562": {
"type": "entry",
"published": "2022-07-29T14:23:11+00:00",
"url": "https://twitter.com/jaredcwhite/status/1553023336342466562",
"photo": [
"https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FY1yfjSVUAIX90T.jpg"
],
"content": {
"text": "After a hiatus of nearly a year\u2026the vlog has returned!\n\nWelcome to Season 6, Episode 1 of Essential Life with Jared.\n\nA stroll along Portland\u2019s South Waterfront, making a green drink in the kitchen, the Molalla River Recreation area, and more!\n\nyoutube.com/watch?v=8TIiLA\u2026",
"html": "After a hiatus of nearly a year\u2026the vlog has returned!\n\nWelcome to Season 6, Episode 1 of Essential Life with Jared.\n\nA stroll along Portland\u2019s South Waterfront, making a green drink in the kitchen, the Molalla River Recreation area, and more!\n\n<a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8TIiLAYnj3A\">youtube.com/watch?v=8TIiLA\u2026</a>"
},
"author": {
"type": "card",
"name": "Jared White",
"url": "https://twitter.com/jaredcwhite",
"photo": "https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1431863008288931841/hsLQJBv4.jpg"
},
"post-type": "photo"
}
},
"_id": "30558372",
"_source": "2773"
}
