So I’m posting from my own personal website then it gets sent to Twitter. IndieWeb stuff! That’s why you see a link then. I’ve debated taking it out but makes for a good talking point.
If you’re reading this, interact with it. This is a slight experiment in reach in the IndieWeb.
I’m out here for the IndieWeb Summit this weekend! And every other people centric event this week lol
If you’re reading this, interact with it. This is a slight experiment in reach in the IndieWeb.
So I’m posting to my site that uses a service called Bridgy to syndicate my content to Twitter (as well as giving me a reference URL so I can keep a link on my site). A bunch of IndieWeb goodness
Speaking of IndieWeb Summit, on a smaller scale we are finally restarting the Homebrew Website Club in Austin. Next meetup is July 3rd, 6:30pm at Mozart’s Coffee. We’ll talk about sessions and projects from IndieWeb Summit.
This week’s guest on Micro Monday is @jgmac1106. Greg talks to Jean about the upcoming IndieWeb Summit and more.
No worries! If you do wanna talk shop with some people about it; there’s usually someone around at http://indieweb.org/discuss! But to your original question; it’s a clean way to prevent duplication of semantic information as one can get out of date/sync. Meant to encourage intentional markup versus just jamming anything in there with microformats.
To a degree, the IndieWeb provides that. That’s how I’m replying to this from my site. There’s a interest in backfeeding and bridge building in the IndieWeb. But the case of keeping content “organic” is sound.
Did you mean microformats? Webmentions are just (largely) requests being sent back and forth.